- edited description
scraper for DeGruyter is extracting wrong information
The publication on http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/itit.2014.56.issue-5/itit-2014-1048/itit-2014-1048.xml contains the following metadata:
Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., et al. (2014). Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?. Special Issue: Social Media / Katrin Weller, Markus Strohmaier. it - Information Technology, 56(5), pp. 207-215. Retrieved 9 Aug. 2016, from doi:10.1515/itit-2014-1048
However, the DeGryterScraper is extracting this BibTeX:
@misc{stefanie2014tweets,
author = {Haustein Stefanie and Larivière Vincent and Thelwall Mike and Amyot Didier and Peters Isabella},
booktitle = {it - Information Technology},
doi = {10.1515/itit-2014-1048},
issn = {21967032},
pages = {207--},
title = {Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?},
url = {http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/itit.2014.56.issue-5/itit-2014-1048/itit-2014-1048.xml},
volume = {56},
year = {2014}
}
The final page is missing and the author names are not correctly separated (Lastname Firstname) - they should be separated by "," (Lastname, Firstname). Furthermore - if possible - the BibTeX type should be correctly determined (in the above case `article').
Comments (9)
-
reporter -
reporter - changed status to open
-
reporter - edited description
-
The scraper downloads the Endnote from DeGruyter:
TY - GENERIC AU - Haustein Stefanie AU - Larivière Vincent AU - Thelwall Mike AU - Amyot Didier AU - Peters Isabella TI - Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? T2 - it - Information Technology J2 - itit VL - 56 M1 - 5 SP - 207 PY - 2014 PY - 2014 SN - 21967032 DO - 10.1515/itit-2014-1048 UR - //www.degruyter.com/view/j/itit.2014.56.issue-5/itit-2014-1048/itit-2014-1048.xml Y2 - 2016-09-20T23:53:43.097+02:00 ER -
author names are not correct, missing ','; the type is always GENERIC and the final page is also missing :(
-
-
assigned issue to
-
assigned issue to
-
Scraping the data directly from the website seems to be the only way to get them correctly.
-
- changed status to on hold
-
reporter OK, then I suggest to contact DeGruyter and give them a hint that their RIS export is broken.
-
Contacted DeGruyter, waiting for the reply and fix
- Log in to comment