Use of COJP_MAX_JOIN_ATTEMPT is inconsistent

[Mališa Vučinić]

Ben Kaduk wrote (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/uvht3lyqg63xz7QzneaAIEkuZNk):

The string COJP_MAX_JOIN_ATTEMPTS appears only twice in the text, once
in Section 8.3.1 and again in the table in Section 8.5. The former text
leaves me confused as to what counts as a "join attempt" for this
purpose, and in particular how it differs from the MAX_RETRANSMIT timer
mentioned in the previous sentence.

‌

[Mališa Vučinić]

Fix Issue #65: Stress difference between MAX_RETRANSMIT and COJP_MAX_JOIN_ATTEMPTS.

→ <<cset 678e23ca92e6>>