optimize jcms doesn't work for some

[Alessandro Padovani]

1.7.2.1810

For example the forearm jcms. Let me know if this is on purpose or something you forgot about. I mean if it can’t be optimized because it is difficult to code then I’ll close.

Ideally the driver below should be “clamp(0.955*A-1.25,0,1)“, unless I miss something.

‌

‌

[Alessandro Padovani]

p.s. very minor but using X Y Z variable names for X Y Z rotations would make the expressions more readable

[Thomas Larsson]

All jcms should have good drivers now.

On variable names. Many morphs are driven by several sliders. Then the variables are named a, b, c etc. By starting with “a” I don’t risk running out of letters before the 256-character limit is reached, and one must add a new scripted driver anyway. For the jcm drivers that shouldn’t be an issue because the jcms are driven by a single rotation component.

[Alessandro Padovani]

Commit 2534a9e works fine, thank you for the fix.

As for variables yes I was talking about jcms but again that's minor.

[DomDomk]

Hi Thomas and Alessandro, please can you take a look at the topic I just created, it’s not public yet, until you open it. I have seen a huge performance drop when upgrading to the latest versions, I have uploaded a comparative video.