"share fee group"
Quote from: bitcoinpaul on Today at 10:20:07 AM
Instead of leasing forge power, you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still have to try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful. ... Could this be done with AT and would that make sense?
Quote from: igmaca on Today at 12:11:23 PM
Exactly (I'm sorry but I'm not a native English speaker )
I do not know how you can implement technically but that's the idea
this means;
Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes) Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day)
You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive. An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased memory storage capacity
Quote from: igmaca on Today at 11:00:39 AM Quote from: mcjavar on Today at 10:58:30 AM Quote from: igmaca on Today at 10:14:14 AM I would like introduce to the discussion the concept of sharing fees when small account decide to use a pool for receive fees more frequently over time.
Everybody talks about "leasing forging power of a account to another account to create pools". This involves reducing the number of nodes to the number of pools.
I maintain that it is better to keep the funds and forging power of each small account in the small account node
Is Not better the concept of sharing fees if your account is successful and forge?
who can refute my idea?
Dafuq did you just say (once again)? o_0
leasing forging power of a account to another account to create pools
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 100.000 Nxt Coin per pool
John account 90.000 Nxt 0 Node participate in forging Mary account 9.900 Nxt 0 Node participate in forging Bob account 100 Nxt 0 Node participate in forging
Total pool 100.000 Nxt 1 Node paticipate in forging Total 1 Node participate in forging
Chance to forge 0,0001 rate forging 1440 blocs per day 52,6 Blocs per year aprox 1 Bloc per week
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 100.000 Nxt Coin per pool 10.000 Node participate in forging
Sharing fees
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 100.000 Nxt Coin per pool
John account 90.000 Nxt 1 Node participate in forging Mary account 9.900 Nxt 1 Node participate in forging Bob account 100 Nxt 1 Node participate in forging
Total pool 100.000 Nxt Total Nodes 3 Node participate in forging
Chance to forge 0,0001 rate forging 1440 blocs per day 52,6 Blocs per year aprox 1 Bloc per week
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 100.000 Nxt Coin per pool 30.000 Nodes participate in forging. if there are only three accounts linked per pool
I am wrong?
I suppose 30,000 nodes are sufficient to ensure the network
Now imagine if I am correct with 1,000,000 Nxt coins pools
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool
10 accounts 90.000 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging 10 accounts 9.900 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging 10 accounts 100 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging
Total pool 1.000.000 Nxt Total 30 Nodes participate in forging
Chance to forge 0,001 rate forging 1440 blocs per day 526 Blocs per year aprox 1,44 Blocs per day. 100 Nxt account is forging every day. receives fees in proportion to their funds every day!!!
1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin 1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool 30.000 Nodes participate in forging. if there are only 30 accounts linked per pool
Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes) Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day)
You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive. An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased memory storage capacity
Comments (0)
