- changed title to IANA Consideration: Explicit Typing?
- edited description
IANA Consideration: Explicit Typing?
Perhaps we should add explicit typing in the JAR.
Type being application/oauth-jar+jwt
.
This, however, adds IANA consideration.
If we are adding, the example in section 5 needs to be updated. Right now, it is just using application/jwt
Comments (5)
-
reporter -
There isn't any normative text that says the content-type needs to be "application/jwt" or otherwise. Only in the examples. How is this "application/oauth-jar+jwt" any different than a "application/jwt" type?
-
reporter - changed status to open
Hmm. You are right. Then, perhaps we should stick to application/jwt. That's the minimalist way of approaching it, right?
-
Yes, unless we want to write a section explaining the specifics or differences and then also register the type. Also, do you think we should specify the return type in the response like the examples?
-
reporter - changed status to wontfix
- Log in to comment