Suggestion to improve 'safely at' cost

Create issue
Issue #34 wontfix
Former user created an issue

The 'safely at' cost isn't quite accurate.because the 'bank for frenzy lucky' doesn't include the fact that the 'bank for frenzy lucky' value increases when the item is bought.

Its usually not a major amount, but it would be nice if the 'safely at' cost was the cost of the item + 'bank for frenzy lucky' amount AFTER the increase for the bought item would be applied.

Comments (1)

  1. Riikka Kalliomäki repo owner

    Working as intended.

    This has been discussed at length, and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it's more optimal to buy the item when you don't affect your current maximum lucky rather than your future maximum lucky. Hence, the "safely at" value uses your current maximum bank for lucky.

    Simply put: Waiting for additional cookies to cover your future maximum lucky does not give you any benefit, whereas making the next purchase earlier gives your more cookies faster.

    As I believe the current implementation is more optimal, this suggestion will not be implemented.

  2. Log in to comment