Syntax checker incorrectly flags set()

[Jeff Hube]

private void foo() {
    set(1);
}

private void set(Integer i) { }

In the above snippet, there will be a red squiggly on the open parenthesis of set(1) with the following message:

< expected, got '('

---

<, <name identifier> or '[' expected, got '('

[Scott Wells]

Thanks, Jeff. One of the most fun things about reverse engineering grammars for Apex/SOQL/SOSL is that the line between reserved words and valid identifier names is very blurry, especially across the three languages. I have a pretty standard approach to resolving these types of issues, though, so I'll make sure this gets addressed in one of the near-term releases.

[Scott Wells]

Delivered with 1.6.8.5.