Abstract constructor not showing as being used in IC2
Issue #880
resolved
This is a minor nuisance, but in the case of an inner abstract class's constructor, even though I have concrete classes that call super(), is logged as being unused. The constructor in question actually has code coverage, so I know it's hooked up right...? Like I said, minor nuisance. Code saves/compiles/runs just fine and this is not a situation I run into very much.
Comments (3)
-
repo owner
-
repo owner
This is fixed and will be included in the next build.
-
repo owner
- changed status to resolved
Delivered in 2.0.1.1.
- Log in to comment
- Assignee
- –
- Type
- Priority
- Status
- resolved
- Component
- Code Inspections and Intentions
- Version
- 2.0.1.0
- Votes
- 0
- Watchers
- 1
Yeah, if it's not showing as being used something isn't wiring together properly. I'll take a look. I know you marked it as trivial but for refactoring and inspections it's critical that all of this be correct. Thanks for filing!