Abstract constructor not showing as being used in IC2

Issue #880 resolved
Derek Wiers created an issue

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 11.36.41 AM.png

This is a minor nuisance, but in the case of an inner abstract class's constructor, even though I have concrete classes that call super(), is logged as being unused. The constructor in question actually has code coverage, so I know it's hooked up right...? Like I said, minor nuisance. Code saves/compiles/runs just fine and this is not a situation I run into very much.

Comments (3)

  1. Scott Wells repo owner

    Yeah, if it's not showing as being used something isn't wiring together properly. I'll take a look. I know you marked it as trivial but for refactoring and inspections it's critical that all of this be correct. Thanks for filing!

  2. Log in to comment