Inner class implementing an inner interface is marked as an error

[Aidan Harding]

This is legal according to Apex:

public with sharing class InnerInterfaces {

    interface IDoStuff {
        void doStuff();
    }

    public class DoStuffImplementation implements IDoStuff {
        public void doStuff() {
        }
    }
}

But the inspector reports an error saying that DoStuffImplementation does not implement doStuff

[Scott Wells]

Okay, after looking back into this I realize the idiocy of my previous comment (and deleted it to avoid confusion). What you're seeing here is a bit of a timing issue that crops up occasionally as IC knits together inheritance relationships. I'll use this issue to track a resolution for that problem.

[Scott Wells]

Delivered in 2.0.1.2 and 1.8.2.1.

[Eric Kintzer]

I'm going to reopen this for 2.0.3.6 as the following code displays the inspection error (but compiles and executes just fine)

public class AssetsServiceImplAsyncHandlers {

    //  Interface to abstract details of configuration for app cancel callout versus kit cancel callout
    public interface IAssetCancelCalloutConfigurator {
        String getHttpMethod();
    }
    //  Concrete implementation of configurators - App, Kit .. add others as needed
    public class AppAssetCalloutConfigurator implements IAssetCancelCalloutConfigurator {
        public String getHttpMethod() {return 'POST';}  
    }

[Scott Wells]

Thanks for letting me know, Eric. I'll take a look.

[Scott Wells]

I was able to reproduce this, though it's definitely quirky...still something timing-related. By making any single change to the method implementation, it all properly links together. I'll dig in and see why it does this intermittently.