1. Armin Rigo
  2. cpython-withatomic

Source

cpython-withatomic / LICENSE

Author Commit Message Date Builds
Guido van Rossum
Since it looks like the dual license clause may be neither necessary nor sufficient to make Python 2.0 compatible with the GPL, we won't bother with it now. In other words, we're still where we were weeks ago -- CNRI believes that its license is GPL-compatible, Stallman says it's not. I'm trying to arrange a meeting between their lawyers so they can work it out. Whether dual licensing is the solution is open at this point. If it is the (only!) solution, we'll add that to the BeOpen license for 2.0 final.
Branches
legacy-trunk
Guido van Rossum
Changes in license names by BobW.
Branches
legacy-trunk
Guido van Rossum
Properly name and number the BEOPEN OPEN SOURCE PYTHON LICENSE AGREEMENT VERSION 1. trade name -> trade names. Note: depending on community feedback, we may end up taking the dual licensing clause out for 2.0b1, and put it back into 2.0final, if there's no other solution for assuring GPL compatibility by then. See my message to python-dev and license-py20.
Branches
legacy-trunk
Guido van Rossum
Various edits. Most importantly, added dual licensing. Also some changes suggested by BobW.
Branches
legacy-trunk
Guido van Rossum
Tentative license. Could still change for the 2.0b1 release and will definitely change for the 2.0 final release.
Branches
legacy-trunk
Guido van Rossum
Adding a LICENSE file so we can have it in the 1.6 release.
Branches
legacy-trunk