Request: Compile BTRFS filesystem as module

Issue #18 wontfix
Krystle created an issue

Hi Stephan,

Because the BTRFS file system is not used by default for the persistence partition, I suggest compiling it as a module. The reason for me is to compile a custom version of the driver and load it. This does not make sense for other users. However, because this driver is not used by default, then I think it will be preferable not to load it the memory and save some space. That way it would be a win-win. What do you think of the idea?

Thank you.
K.

Comments (3)

  1. Stephan Henningsen

    Hi Krystle,

    It’s good input. What you of course don’t know is that I plan to switch to btrfs by default at some point. And Lightwhale actually does allow the user the specify the persistence partition to be formatted as brtfs. It’s just a rather undocumented and untested feature for now. Therefore I’m reluctant to remove the driver from the kernel, because 1) I eventually need it (and therefore eventually will break your system), and 2) someone could potentially be using it right now.

    Not the answer you were looking for, I know, but I hope it makes sense.

  2. Krystle reporter

    Hi Stephan,

    No problem. It's valuable that you make reasonable design decisions. This will make the project more attractive.

    Thank you.
    K.

  3. Log in to comment