License GPL or LGPL
Issue #34
resolved
Original issue 34 created by dtsarkov on 2011-05-05T23:09:27.000Z:
<b>What steps will reproduce the problem?</b> 1. The Google code homepage says the license is LGPL 2. The FaCTpp-linux-v1.5.2.tgz include a Fact++.license.txt file, claiming the license is GPL instead of LGPL.
<b>What is the expected output? What do you see instead?</b> I would like to see a definite answer about the license, and hope the answer is LGPL, instead of GPL.
<b>What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?</b> 1.5.2
<b>Please provide any additional information below.</b>
Comments (2)
-
reporter
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
- Log in to comment
Comment #1 originally posted by dtsarkov on 2015-04-08T16:53:03.000Z:
The license for FaCT++ is LGPL. The licensing file in the FaCT++ is related only to a command-line version that works with LISP-like ontology description. All other versions of FaCT++, including OWL API PWLReasoner implementation and DIG version, are licensed under LGPL.