Incremental reasoning and ABox

Issue #72 new
cbobed created an issue

Hi,

I've tried to use the incremental reasoning mechanism, but when I assert new individuals, it complains about the DAG verification.

The message: DAG verification fail: size 774, expected 1741

is obtained after adding 1000 named individuals programatically.

I'm using Fact++ from the OWLAPI and I have the fpp-options.txt file in the same dir as the JNI .dll is. Is it a problem with the persistence mechanism?

Cheers,

Carlos

Comments (6)

  1. Dmitry Tsarkov repo owner

    Hi Carlos,

    Could you please provide a (possibly small) testcase so I can check this?

  2. cbobed reporter

    Hi Dimitry,

    I am using Fact++ in buffered mode. Is the incremental mode activated by default when creating a nonBufferingReasoner through the OWLAPI?

    may I send the code to you via email?

  3. cbobed reporter

    Hi, I've tried both modes, Buffered and nonBuffered (in both cases through the OWLAPI) and it raises the same DAG verification problem.

    Cheers, Carlos

  4. Dmitry Tsarkov repo owner

    It was an intention to use incremental reasoning in the nonBufferingReasoner. It has not been implemented in the end (mainly due to lack of testing infrastructure). I might get back to it, but I could not provide any ETA for it.

    Please feel free to send me your code (and an ontology if possible) by e-mail.

  5. Log in to comment