- edited description
*let with destructuring-bind expands into wonky things
Issue #1
new
The docs say that *let
should "behave like let*
", which makes me think I should be able to use previously-bound things in the values of later things. The example in the docs seems to confirm this. But it doesn't seem like this works in practice.
For example:
(*let (((foo . bar) (list 1 2))
(n (1+ foo)))
n)
This should destructure the list into foo
and bar
, and then use foo
to define n
. But what it macroexpands to is:
(LET* ((DARG707 (LIST 1 2)) (N (1+ FOO)))
(DESTRUCTURING-BIND (FOO . BAR) DARG707 N))
The lack of nesting here means that foo
isn't defined when we try to use it to define n
.
Comments (1)
-
reporter - Log in to comment