Citation suggestion for Kranc
Currently the ET citations webpage
https://einsteintoolkit.org/citation.html
only lists the Kranc webpage as the Kranc reference. This seems curious, as there’s no mention of the Kranc paper:
https://inspirehep.net/literature/647701
Shouldn’t the paper be added to the list?
Comments (8)
-
-
-
assigned issue to
-
assigned issue to
-
It is old and outdated, but I don’t think that’s a good reason to omit it. I’m not sure what the logic was - maybe we were trying to avoid asking people to cite too many things? I can’t think of a reason not to cite the Kranc paper now. @Erik Schnetter @Peter Diener do you remember any details of this decision?
-
I do not recall. I suggest to ask people to cite the paper as web pages are ephemeral.
-
Possibly there was the anticipation of an updated reference with more authors listed? The paper has as authors: Sascha, Ian, Christiane, while the website adds Erik and Barry.
A requested-for entry may look like this (the entry is already in einsteintoolkit.bib only the requested-for / suggested-for tag is missing):
@Article{Husa:2004ip, requested-for ={Kranc}, author = "Husa, Sascha and Hinder, Ian and Lechner, Christiane", title = "{Kranc: a Mathematica application to generate numerical codes for tensorial evolution equations}", journal = "Comput. Phys. Commun.", volume = 174, year = 2006, pages = "983-1004", eprint = "arXiv:gr-qc/0404023", SLACcitation = "%%CITATION = GR-QC/0404023;%%" }
and a suggested-for one
@Article{Husa:2004ip, suggested-for ={Kranc}, author = "Husa, Sascha and Hinder, Ian and Lechner, Christiane", title = "{Kranc: a Mathematica application to generate numerical codes for tensorial evolution equations}", journal = "Comput. Phys. Commun.", volume = 174, year = 2006, pages = "983-1004", eprint = "arXiv:gr-qc/0404023", SLACcitation = "%%CITATION = GR-QC/0404023;%%" }
-
I don’t remember any details either. Asking for citations to the paper seems reasonable.
-
@Ian Hinder could you either add (as shown above) or let me know which one of the
suggested-for
orrequested-for
tag toeinsteintoolkit.bib
inmanifest
? -
ping
- Log in to comment
My recollection is that Ian says that the Kranc paper is "old and
outdated". Though kranccode.org does say (http://kranccode.org/))
"We request that you cite our 2006 Kranc paper if you use Kranc, or
Kranc-generated code, in a scientific publication."
We currently list nothing for Kranc actually. Only for McLachlan.