missing OMP PRIVATE in CarpetLib (W)ENO prolongation

Create issue
Issue #320 closed
Roland Haas created an issue

this one is actually harmless since the section in question is apparently only ever executed by a single thread (to to an OMP parallel in the calling function data.cc/call_operator).

Also present in the mercurial version as far as I can tell.

ok to apply?

Keyword:

Comments (5)

  1. Erik Schnetter
    • removed comment

    Since the OpenMP parallelisation in the individual operators is unused (and thus misleading), I would rather remove the OpenMP statements there.

  2. Log in to comment