I ran the test, and I think I did something wrong, so maybe usage could be explained. I ran 2D-LongKH.enzo on 8 cores, with changeset 9ec0bc7176a6. I do
and I get this
and for snapshot 18, I get this:
neither of which look like what I expect from the linked paper. Did I mess up? If so, could you clarify? Or are my expectations that it should look like one of the figures from the paper off?
Ah, ok. That looks more reasonable. It doesn't look like it gets as chaotic as in the paper, is that a parameter space issue? It just kind of looks like a wind-up. Here's what I get: http://imgur.com/a/e8OQk
Its a useful starting place for people who want to do that test and looks good. I'll approve it.
This looks good to me. I compiled and did a few quick runs with various parameters to make sure it ran, but didn't have the patience to see it through to useful output. I'm approving but a merge should wait until Dave confirms the run produces correct output on his machine...