Fluoroquinolones
I ran ResFinder 4.0 on the 390 DE raw reads from the paper. For Nalidixic Acid, I find 22% concordance (expected 99.2% from the paper), with no resistance found in any sample (0/99). For Ciprofloxacin I find 38% concordance (expected 99.2%), with resistance found in under half of the samples (105/275).
For the remaining antimicrobials, I either find the same concordance (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefotaxime, tetracylcine) or extremely close (ceftazidime, gentamicin).
There is a ‘fluoroquinolone' row in the ResFinder output that says 'under_development’. Is this a separate entry under development or is it indicating that the fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, are under development and should not be used at this time?
Comments (4)
-
-
Dear Jan,
I just ran a few isolates from the German dataset through ResFinder 4.0 and I am not able to recreate the issue. This is the command I used to run ResFinder:
python3 run_resfinder.py -ifq data/SRR11454052_* -o SRR11454052 -s "Escherichia coli" --acquired --point
Got these results:
# Antimicrobial Class WGS-predicted phenotype Match Genetic background gentamicin aminoglycoside No resistance 0 ciprofloxacin fluoroquinolone Resistant 3 gyrA (p.S83L) azithromycin macrolide Resistant 3 mph(A) (mph(A)_D16251), mph(A) (mph(A)_U36578) ceftazidime beta-lactam Resistant 3 blaCTX-M-102 (blaCTX-M-102_HQ398215), blaCTX-M-27 (blaCTX-M-27_AY156923) ampicillin+clavulanic acid beta-lactam No resistance 0 tetracycline tetracycline Resistant 1 tet(A) (tet(A)_AF534183) tigecycline tetracycline No resistance 0 ampicillin beta-lactam Resistant 3 blaCTX-M-102 (blaCTX-M-102_HQ398215), blaCTX-M-27 (blaCTX-M-27_AY156923) colistin polymyxin No resistance 0 amikacin aminoglycoside No resistance 0 fosfomycin fosfomycin No resistance 0 meropenem beta-lactam No resistance 0 imipenem beta-lactam No resistance 0 cefoxitin beta-lactam No resistance 0 chloramphenicol phenicol No resistance 0 temocillin beta-lactam No resistance 0 tobramycin aminoglycoside No resistance 0 trimethoprim folate pathway antagonist Resistant 3 dfrA17 (dfrA17_FJ460238) ertapenem beta-lactam No resistance 0 piperacillin+tazobactam beta-lactam No resistance 0 cefepime beta-lactam Resistant 3 blaCTX-M-102 (blaCTX-M-102_HQ398215), blaCTX-M-27 (blaCTX-M-27_AY156923) cefotaxime beta-lactam Resistant 3 blaCTX-M-102 (blaCTX-M-102_HQ398215), blaCTX-M-27 (blaCTX-M-27_AY156923) nalidixic acid fluoroquinolone Resistant 3 gyrA (p.S83L), gyrA (p.D87N) sulfamethoxazole folate pathway antagonist Resistant 3 sul1 (sul1_U12338), sul2 (sul2_AY034138)
Did you remember the “--point” flag. It sounds like you are missing the point mutations.
Else try and upgrade your cgecore module by:
sudo pip3 install cgecore --upgrade
If none if this works, post the exact results you got from one of the isolates along with the exact command you used.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Rolf
-
reporter Thank you, the issue was with --point. I had run --acquired --point, but had failed to remove the results of a previous run with only --acquired. There was an error with --point, but since the intermediate files (PointFinder_prediction.txt etc.) and final output (pheno_table files) file were present, I didn't realize the output wasn't updated, and was still from --acquired only.
With the same command,
python3 run_resfinder.py -ifq data/SRR11454052_* -o SRR11454052 -s "Escherichia coli" --acquired --point
and either an empty or non-empty output folder, the error is:Traceback (most recent call last): File ".../resfinder/run_resfinder.py", line 521, in <module> "PointFinder") File ".../resfinder/cge/standardize_results.py", line 346, in standardize_results res_collection, mismatch, gene_results, ref_db_name) File ".../resfinder/cge/standardize_results.py", line 27, in __init__ region_name = region_results[0]["ref_id"] IndexError: list index out of range
If I switch from 4.0 to master, there is no error, so it appears this error has already been addressed.
-
reporter - changed status to resolved
- Log in to comment
Dear Jan
Thanks for reporting this issue.
I will try and see if I can recreate it, and figure out whats going on.
Best regards,
Rolf