Use ulim_alloc rather than ulim_proc when reversing array
David Dickinson
Branch: bugfix/avoid_out_of_bounds_reverse_indexing_in_fields_consistency_test
Branch: 8.1-RC
Merged
Merged pull request
Merged in bugfix/avoid_out_of_bounds_reverse_indexing_in_fields_consistency_test (pull request #513)
Avoids issues when running at large processor count and we may not have ulim_proc==ulim_alloc everywhere
Â
See issue #156