Enhancement request - implicit * in front of a function

[Former user]

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 226 ``` It would be quite handy if speedcrunch assumed an * in front of functions if there is no other operator (+,-,/...) So typing 5cos(34)tan(15) would be the same as 5*cos(34)*tan(15) ```

Reported by `Alister.Hood` on 2008-12-11 00:22:20

[Former user]

``` Hi, thanks for the suggestion. However, this doesn't sound like a good idea to me: 1) it would overcomplicate the expression parser unnecessarily 2) imagine you have a variable "mytax", what would "mytaxsin(90)" mean? so only numbers should be accepted? that would be awkward and complicate the parser even more. ```

Reported by `helder.pereira.correia` on 2008-12-11 08:33:19 - Status changed: `Invalid`

[Former user]

``` Fair enough - I hadn't thought about variables. ```

Reported by `Alister.Hood` on 2008-12-11 10:15:16