[Spectral Processing] what about non-profile outputs?

[Andreas Rabe]

We have algorithms that create spectral profiles, e.g. “Spectral Resampling”, but we have also algorithms that create simple attributes, e.g. “Predict classification layer” creates a new attribute with the predicted class ID:

‌

Currently it looks like, that those outputs are also stored as SpectralProfiles, which is not very user-friendly:

‌

‌

As far as I can see, there is also no easy way to unpack the y values into a normal field afterwards.

[Benjamin Jakimow]

1-band raster outputs should be mapped to float/int field type.

[Andreas Rabe]

1-band raster outputs should be mapped to float/int field type.

That is a good idea

[Andreas Rabe]

And what about multi-band non-profile output, e.g. class probability or fractions?

Any chance to redirect a 5 band fraction result into 5 fields?

[Benjamin Jakimow]

@Andreas Janz conceptually multi-band output is always profile output. Technically a future version might allow to set an additional checkbox to allow for storing multiband raster outputs into single numeric/categorical fields.

[Andreas Rabe]

That would be nice