- changed status to on hold
very slow plotting/reading of EnMAP L2A profiles compared to QGIS
Issue #418
invalid
download test scene: http://www.enmap.org/sites/default/files/testdata/L2A_Alps_1_land.zip
use this raster:
Downloads\L2A_Alps_1_land\ENMAP01-____L2A-DT000326721_20170626T102020Z_001_V000204_20200406T201930Z-SPECTRAL_IMAGE.TIF
Comments (6)
-
-
reporter - changed status to resolved
Looks good now!
-
reporter - changed status to open
I again observe much slower reading of pixel profiles in the EnMAP-Box compared to QGIS. Please try this dataset:
ENMAP01-____L1C-DT000326721_20170626T102020Z_001_V000204_20200406T180016Z-SPECTRAL_IMAGE.TIF
from https://www.enmap.org/sites/default/files/testdata/L1C_Alps_1.zip
-
reporter I can also reproduce this for the enmap_berlin.bsq test raster!
-
reporter @Fabian Thiel please also check on your system.
-
reporter - changed status to invalid
Not reproducable anymore.
- Log in to comment
cannot replicate this on QGIS 3.12.2 Is it still too slow with the current enmapbox develop version?