ver 0.3.0 LIST discoveries
Hi John,
Continuing to work w/ the new version, I came across this one. Not sure if it also existed in versions before.
I create a VAR and make it a list:
And the reporter shows correctly:
However if I use the
option to create the list. its content is NOT [empty list], but rather [0,0] for all “new list length” s “blank”, 0, 1, 2. Only starting at length 3 does it produce the correct content of [0, 0, 0].
NOTE: “blank” indicates I place the cursor in the length field and delete any and all entry there by DEL key.
Above is for “new list length” s: “blank”, 0, 1, 2
Also, since the first version “list >” produces an [empty list], I was expecting the “new list length” to also produce an [empty list] for length 0 at the very least.
Thus the result of the sequence of blocks below is not right I believe.
For you assessment.
TG
Comments (3)
-
repo owner -
repo owner Fixed. Fix will be in the 0.3.4 release.
-
repo owner - changed status to resolved
- Log in to comment
Thanks for the careful testing and thorough write-up.
I’ve verified that “new list length _” with inputs of blank or 0 return a list with two elements rather than an empty list and an input of 1 also returns a list with two elements. Will fix.