gd_bmp.c use of both ceil() and ceill() deliberate?
Issue #98
new
Line 795 of gd_bmp.c uses the ceill() function (two "l"s). Line 863 of gd_bmp.c uses the ceil() function (one "l").
Is this deliberate? Given the definition of the width member of "bmp_info_t", I believe "ceil()" (one "l") is sufficient. Please clarify.
Some platforms' libm don't implement ceill(), so result is undefined symbol during linking (NetBSD/macppc-6.99.24). (Also, some silently succeed anyway (NetBSD/{i386,amd64}-{current,6.1_STABLE}) even without prototype or implementation).
Hi all,
I concur it is also problematic on Cygwin and that using ceil seems enough.
Best, JP