- edited description
Transport calling mechanism seems inverted
Issue #5
resolved
How you call itoolkit transports seems backwards to me:
itransport = iLibCall()
itool = iToolKit()
itool.add(...)
itool.call(itransport)
would make more sense to me as:
itransport = iLibCall()
itool = iToolKit()
itool.add(...)
itransport.call(itool)
Comments (5)
-
reporter -
Account Deleted This is a low priority, but will be considered in future release.
-
Account Deleted - changed status to on hold
status
-
reporter - edited description
- changed status to open
-
reporter - changed status to resolved
Migrated to https://github.com/IBM/python-itoolkit/issues/5
- Log in to comment