Applications don't see RLV
Issue #112
resolved
Carlyle Solution Wardrobe says there's no RLV. This might be happening with other applications that check for RLV. Noticed that the view does not respond to @version the way RLVa does.
Comments (7)
-
-
repo owner
Henri is right, any viewer implementing the RLV API replies with its correct version number. However, recent RLVa (this means Firestorm mostly) reply with a version number that is much higher than the current RLV API version (which is currently 2.9.xx.xx).
If you think there is a bug, please write a simple script to reproduce it and paste its source code here, so I can try. Don't forget to add what version number you're expecting the script to get from the viewer, and the version number you're receiving instead.
-
reporter
Thanks for responding and I understand. I can report the issue to Carlyle solutions. I have a better understanding now of what's going on.
-
reporter
I just sent an offline IM to Carlyle Theas and included a link to this conversations, so I'd appreciate if stayed open like this for a little while longer. She can get the gist and fix her script.
-
reporter
This has been resolved. The problem was with my viewer, lag or something. Thanks for checking into it. It seemed more 'real' than it was. This can be closed.
-
repo owner
Good to know that it works on your side again, thanks for getting back to me about it. Closing the ticket now.
-
repo owner
- changed status to resolved
- Log in to comment
It's a bug in the scripts. The official API specification is Marine's, and all scripts shall comply with it: if a script proves unable to detect Marine's genuine and original implementation because the scripter coded it to only recognize the RLVa fork versions, then the scripter is at fault for introducing an incompatibility bug !