- attached Fig 12p6 from book.png
Plot in Fig 12.6(b) looks slightly incorrect
Issue #57
resolved
This item specifically refers to: Version v3.0i (2018-11-11), Example 12.3, Figure 12.6, pg. 12-12.
I used maxima & the COMA toolbox to plot the step response and magnitude response for P(s), C(s) as given in Example 12.3. The plots for Guw look slightly different from what's in the book.
kp : 0.6; ki : 0.5; kd : 2.0; Tf : 0.1; P : 1/(s+1)^3; C : (kds^2+kps+ki) / s/(s^2Tf^2/2 + sTf + 1); T : PC; Gyv : P/(1+T); Guw : C/(1+T); /step_response(Gyv, xrange=[0,20]);/ step_response(Guw, xrange=[0,2]); /magnitude_plot(Gyv, xrange=[0.1, 10], yrange=[10^-2, 1]);*/ magnitude_plot(Guw, xrange=[0.1, 100], yrange=[.1, 100]);
Comments (6)
-
reporter -
reporter - edited description
-
reporter - edited description
-
reporter - edited description
-
repo owner Fixed in commit d854313. Parameters in the text were incorrect. They should have been
kp = 2.0;
ki = 1.5;
kd = 2.0;
Tf = 0.1; -
repo owner - changed status to resolved
Fixed.
- Log in to comment