Refer consistently to project as “Coverage”

Issue #275 resolved
Ben Finney created an issue

The documentation, messages, and comments have numerous inconsistent names for the Coverage system and project. I recommend to change all references to the project and system to use the name “Coverage”.

The names “” and “” are obsolete – the code is not in a single file – and confusing, since ‘’ strongly connotes a single module file.

The attached patch changes all references to the system and project to “Coverage”, which leaving unchanged the references to the commands, modules, and terminology.

Comments (2)

  1. Ben Finney reporter

    I see that a version 4.0 is coming up soon. Can we please use that opportunity to consistently use the name “Coverage”, or pick some other name and use it consistently?

  2. Ned Batchelder repo owner

    Thanks for the push. I've decided to use "" consistently as the project name. True, there is no file named "," but I am OK with that. "Coverage" is too vague all by itself.

    Fixed in e6b27046afb3

  3. Log in to comment