Stability of the testnet

Issue #10 new
marcus03 created an issue

We need to plan for the stability of the testnet, too.

Comments (14)

  1. ChuckOne

    Not sure. We saw a really huge response from the community to support the testnet a while ago. If we implement an important feature, those to which this feature is relevant will support it. I think so, at least.

  2. Ian Ravenscroft

    Its not expensive... I'm running 4 public vps on test net - two in Europe, one in US and one in Japan... They are small and cheap machines... I think since we got the 'switch' in 8.6 - helping with test net is a case of set up a properties file and start NRS so people can easily run both nodes... So i don't think its a priority for now??

  3. marcus03 reporter

    I think there is more to it than to state that we have enough nodes (do we?) and they are cheap to run. Can we reset the blockchain in a coordinated manner across all nodes? How we make sure that the majority of nodes is updated to the current NRS as seen fit by the developers?

  4. marcus03 reporter

    Ok.

    Not voting, since I think it's (also) InfCom job to plan and cater for a long-term stable and usuable testnet.

  5. EvilDave

    Couple of points: We are not solely responsible for the health of the entire NXTwork. Inf-Com (like the other committees) is intended to be a tool to streamline the funding process, not to take control/ownership of all NXTwork related issues.

    Having said that, I like the brainstorming direction we are taking and there's a lot of useful stuff coming out here, so let's carry on being pro-active, but keep in mind our main function: decisions on funding.

    I do think that the Testnet is, like all NXTwork assets, at least partially our responsibilty. If a Testnet project is submitted to us for funding, we should certainly consider it.

    And: would it be possible to utilise the Testnet to run a performance benchmark on and then scale those results up to get an estimate of NXTwork performance?

  6. Ian Ravenscroft

    I don't think we need to 'own' anything but I think we all agree we need a TestNet so for me this is about defining 'what' test net is needed and how it might be funded - I don't think we need to own any of it, just encourage the right sustainable test net to develop.

  7. Log in to comment