Basic, Messages - phone_number format not specified
Issue #316
resolved
Shouldn’t we mandate that phone_number has to follow the E.164 serialization?
Comments (3)
-
-
-
assigned issue to
- changed status to open
RECOMMEND E.164.
-
assigned issue to
-
- changed status to resolved
Fix
#316- RECOMMEND E.164 as phone_number Basic, Messages - Log in to comment
I wish if we could, but it was intentionally left free format in the beginning to accommodate some of the existing implementations.