Basic 2.3.2, 2.4.2, others - user_id examples not consistent

[Michael Jones]

The user_id values used in examples are not consistent. In once place, it's:

"user_id": "AItOawmwtWwcT0k51BayewNvutrJUqsvl6qs7A4",

In another place, it's:

"user_id": "248289761001",

I'd suggest we use the same value in all example examples - probably the numeric one. Check this in other specs besides Basic as well.

[John Bradley]

yes

[Edmund Jay]

fix #419 Basic 2.3.2, 2.4.2, others - user_id examples not consistent

→ 7a8ce9970821