Core: Missing "sub" in examples of aggregated and distributed claims

[Vladimir Dzhuvinov]

The mandatory "sub" is left out from the two examples:

http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#AggregatedDistributedClaims

[Michael Jones]

Thanks. I will add "sub" values to these examples.

[Michael Jones]

Fixed #1018 - Missing "sub" in examples of aggregated and distributed claims

→ <<cset a7f53e89fce6>>

[Daniel Fett]

Sorry to dig up this old issue; but where is it written that “sub” is mandatory in aggregated and distributed claims?

I only see this text:

The JWT SHOULD NOT contain a sub (subject) Claim unless its value is an identifier for the End-User at the Claims Provider (and not for the OpenID Provider or another party); this typically means that a sub Claim SHOULD NOT be provided.

‌