Section 5.1 - Holder's Identifier

[Edmund Jay]

Comments from TL regarding original Credential Provider spec:

Section 5.1

• Why do you use a „did" claim to convey the holder’s identifier instead of „iss“/„sub" claims?

‌

[Tom Jones]

The “Holder” ugliness comes from the CCG, not from OpenID. The real question should be how do we handle delegated permissions. The GNAP team is taking a serious look at this.