Section 5.1 - Holder's Identifier
Issue #1281
new
Comments from TL regarding original Credential Provider spec:
Section 5.1
- Why do you use a „did" claim to convey the holder’s identifier instead of „iss“/„sub" claims?
The “Holder” ugliness comes from the CCG, not from OpenID. The real question should be how do we handle delegated permissions. The GNAP team is taking a serious look at this.