Section 4 - Use OIDC4VP Spec for VC/VPs

[Edmund Jay]

Comments from TL :

‌

What do you think about adopting the same representation for credentials as (whatever we decide to use with) the OIDC 4 W3C Verifiable Credential Objects spec? If so, we could align the two drafts and focus OIDC 4 W3C Verifiable Credential Objects onto VPs or merge both specs. This would potentially allow wallet providers to use the same protocol to provide VPs and (bearer) VCs.

[Kristina Yasuda]

This should be a very outdated comment. “OIDC 4 W3C Verifiable Credential Objects spec“ is now called OIDC4VP (https://openid.bitbucket.io/connect/openid-connect-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.html). OIDC4VP and CA should be aligned, but not merged as they have different scopes.

I think we were discussing that query language requesting specific type of credential should be similar across OIDC4VP and CA specs.

[Nat Sakimura]

@Edmund, where was this comment located in https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/39/ ? I do not seem to be able to find…

[Edmund Jay]

This comment was separated out from #1268 for the obsolete pull request #34, mainly applying for the Credential Provider spec.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/34#comment-236186876

Since the CP is merged, the same comments would still apply.

[Edmund Jay]

@Kristina Yasuda I’ve updated the title, but will leave the original comment from TL.