OIDC4SSI strategy - comments to OIDF Strategic TF
Gail, Executive Director of OIDF has welcomed participants of SIOP special calls to comment on the OIDC4SSI strategy by 1/24, for those comments to be reflected in the next OIDF Strategic Task Force discussion. (also circulated in a ML by Gail)
Comments (5)
-
-
reporter URL to the whitepaper draft for the people to comment/make suggestions, provided by a group of editors (Kristina, Jo, Torsten, David C., Kenichi) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H556GIM_xD1yKl7rw1seq4bu83movFCkU8fQ7T8b1dI/edit
-
reporter noting a suggestion from Alen:
“Signatures are something we may/should discuss in a separate document. with all the:
- payload encoding
- signing algorithms (NIST/ENISA approved and unapproved)
- packaging (detached, enveloping, enveloped)
- format (JAdES (there are 4 levels), JWS, LD-Proof, AnonCreds, BBS+)
- coupling or decoupling dictionaries/vocabularies
it gets challenging.
-
reporter First milestone - publishing an Editor’s draft at EIC - DONE: https://openid.net/wordpress-content/uploads/2022/05/OIDF-Whitepaper_OpenID-for-Verifiable-Credentials_FINAL_2022-05-12.pdf
Next step, reflect incoming comments, and in particular enhance 1) Use-cases, and potentially 2) comparison with DIDComm sections.
Will update the word to reflect a published version.
-
- changed status to resolved
Migrated to GitHub
- Log in to comment
Standards Goal: I would suggest to add stabilization of OpenID Connect 4 Verifiable Credential Issuance. On a more general level, we could also aim at “providing a complete protocol suite for SSI use cases based on OpenID Connect”.