-
assigned issue to
"Self-Issued OP Request" may deserve a definition
The term “Self-Issued OP Request” appears 13 times in this document. However, it is not formally defined and only described at the beginning of Clause 5.
OpenID Connect Authentication Request that results in an End-User providing an ID Token to the Relying Party through the Self-Issued OP
I am not even sure if this description is correct. For example, if the user denial or other things resulting an error, would that request now become something else than Self-Issued OP Request? Probably not.
It probably would be better to introduce it as a defined term. A bit of generalization would help to make it consistent.
Proposal:
Introduce the following as a defined term.
Self-Issued OP Request
OpenID Connect Authentication Request to a Self-Issued OP
Change the beginning of Clause 5 as follows:
Self-Issued OP Request results in the provision of ID Token to the requesting Relying Party when End-User authentication succeeds and the End-User provides necessary grant.
Comments (3)
-
-
- changed status to open
Please review Issue #115, in particular this commit https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/commits/f44d9aa9667dc25600207409dde883694e48a769
-
- changed status to resolved
PR #115 merged
- Log in to comment
Editors believe this is an editorial issue and does not change normative language. PR will be created to be merged before official Implementer’s draft voting period begins on Feb 1st.