-
assigned issue to
6.2 "must" is intentional?
Issue #1421
resolved
There is a small cased “must” in section 6.2. Is this intentional? Perhaps it was meant to be MUST instead?
If so, section 6.2 will have two MUSTs. It would be a good idea to introduce a subdivision so that each MUST can be quoted with section or bullet numbers.
Comments (4)
-
-
Please review and approve PR #116, especially https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/commits/d1cedc5533e03a927735531f5aa153d3d8c3c991
-
- changed status to open
SIOP call 2022-01-27
-
- changed status to resolved
addressed in PR #116
- Log in to comment
This must was intentional. Will capitalize and distinguish with another must