openid / connect / issues / #1421 - 6.2 "must" is intentional? — Bitbucket

Issue #1421 resolved

Nat Sakimura created an issue 2022-01-26

There is a small cased “must” in section 6.2. Is this intentional? Perhaps it was meant to be MUST instead?

If so, section 6.2 will have two MUSTs. It would be a good idea to introduce a subdivision so that each MUST can be quoted with section or bullet numbers.

Comments (4)

Kristina Yasuda
- assigned issue to
  
  Kristina Yasuda
This must was intentional. Will capitalize and distinguish with another must
- 2022-01-26T17:11:47+00:00
Kristina Yasuda
Please review and approve PR #116, especially https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/commits/d1cedc5533e03a927735531f5aa153d3d8c3c991
- 2022-01-27T03:40:51+00:00
Kristina Yasuda
- changed status to open
SIOP call 2022-01-27
- 2022-02-03T05:42:23+00:00
Kristina Yasuda
- changed status to resolved
addressed in PR #116
- 2022-02-03T05:42:48+00:00
Log in to comment

Assignee: Kristina Yasuda

Type: bug

Priority: major

Status: resolved

Component: Verifiable Presentation

Milestone: –

Version: –

Votes: 0

Watchers: 1

Jira: the preferred issue tracker for Bitbucket. Join the team!