[OpenID4VP] Section "11.5. Response Mode direct_post" is not normative and should be moved to an Annex

[Giuseppe De Marco]

The section https://openid.bitbucket.io/connect/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.html#name-response-mode-direct_post-2 has a great value for the implementation guidance

however it doesn’t give any normative value for the specs because it gives insights about the internal API/Architecture of a Verifier implementation

For this reason I purpose to move it in an annex, since the internals API and parameters within the Verifier infrastructure should be taken out of the scopes of the specification, and then taken as non-normative

[Kristina Yasuda]

Editors put it intentionally in the implementation considerations section, and it is not normative intentionally. as you said it provides important guidance that we cannot risk not being read which may happen if we move it to the Annex. So i would strongly prefer keeping it in the implementation considerations.

[Giuseppe De Marco]

It’s fair

[Giuseppe De Marco]

Closed since the section under discussion is already within a section dedicated to considerations without any normative scope or value