Multiple value types in definition of credentials

Issue #2001 resolved
Roland Hedberg created an issue

In 4.1.1 credentials is defined to be: "A JSON array, where every entry is a JSON object or a JSON string."

To an implementer this is terrible. Getting a piece of information where you have to figure out what kind of values are included is not very efficient.

I propose that credentials be limited to "A JSON array, where every entry is a JSON object" and then add

credential_references which are defined as "A JSON array of strings"

Comments (5)

  1. Michael Jones

    Splitting the set of credentials into two pieces has its own downsides. I don’t think there’s a compelling reason to not continue to use the current polymorphic JSON arrays.

  2. Roland Hedberg reporter

    If the split is done the code becomes so much simpler and less error prone. Which to me is reason enough.

  3. Kristina Yasuda

    we discussed it in the editor’s call. there was not much support in making this change. We already have places where there is polymorphism - for example, in the VP Token when the entry can be a string or an object depending on the credential format.

    what you are suggesting would probably look like below and it didn’t look very pretty..

    {
       "credential_issuer": "https://credential-issuer.example.com",
       "credentials": [
          {
             "format": "mso_mdoc",
             "doctype": "org.iso.18013.5.1.mDL"
          }
       ],
       "credentials_references": ["UniversityDegree_JWT"],
       "grants": {
          "authorization_code": {
             "issuer_state": "eyJhbGciOiJSU0Et...FYUaBy"
          },
          "urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:pre-authorized_code": {
             "pre-authorized_code": "adhjhdjajkdkhjhdj",
             "user_pin_required": true
          }
       }
    }
    

    We think that one way to address this might be by removing the option of the entry in the “credentials” array to be an object, by introducing an id element in the credentials_supported (issue #1923)…

  4. Log in to comment