- changed milestone to Implementer's Draft
[Federation] Fix Figure 3 Entity Statement Example
Issue #2131
resolved
The example fails to parse, due to incorrect placement of a comma and missing closing brace.
https://openid.bitbucket.io/connect/openid-federation-1_0.html#name-example-entity-statement-jw
Readers will be helped if the order of the JWT claims in the example followed the order of their definition.
Comments (6)
-
-
reporter - changed status to open
I was thinking of using the exact same order the claims are currently defined. This will be found most logical and natural.
-
That makes sense.
-
reporter -
-
assigned issue to
-
assigned issue to
-
- changed status to resolved
- Log in to comment
Yes, please create a PR fixing the syntax in the example.
What specific claims reordering are you proposing for the example? I think that starting with iss, sub, iat, exp makes sense, for instance.