Discovery 2.1 - Identifier normalization rules are not extensible

Issue #354 resolved
Michael Jones created an issue

In reaction to this statement "The Identifier normalization rules are not extensible", Yaron Goland wrote:

This seems backwards to me. As I argue below shouldn’t we say “we define the behavior for email and HTTPS, everything else is currently UNDEFINED.”?

What is the reason we chose to say that the rules are not extensible?

Comments (4)

  1. Michael Jones reporter

    Fix #354: Discovery 2.1 - Identifier normalization rules are not extensible Fix #355: Standard 2.1.1 - Possibly overly broad treatment of @ character Fix #356: Discovery 2.1.3 - Extracting hosts from URIs

    dbea67a92d19

  2. Log in to comment