1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. connect

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (1–25 of 120)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Version Created Updated Actions
#724: Basic - Tony Nadalin's review comments
Basic
bug major resolved
#560: Basic General - Please consider to create a basic profile based on code
proposal major duplicate
#305: Basic, Messages, Standard - Relying on prompt:none side effect bad design
bug minor resolved
#526: Basic - Basic spec will become the de-facto Connect standard unless deleted
bug major invalid
#516: Basic 2.4.2.1, Messages 2.4.2.1 - Address schema elements underspecified
bug minor wontfix
#515: Basic 2.4.2, Messages 2.4.2 - Question about requirement that UserInfo response be JSON
bug trivial wontfix
#495: Basic, Messages, Standard - "phone" scope value not defined
bug major resolved
#306: Basic, Messages, Standard - Need for prompt:consent questionable
bug minor invalid
#308: Basic, Messages, Standard, Registration, Session - Do we need to use expires_in when the expiration time can be in the tokens?
bug major invalid
#91: Basic -3.2.1 non-normative exapmle includes 2 white spaces which are not encoded
bug major resolved
#59: Basic - 2 Check Session presented with access token
bug major resolved
#726: Basic 2.2.6.1 - Client authentication clarifications
Basic
bug minor resolved
#594: Basic 2.1, Implicit 2.1 - claims_in_id_token scope missing
bug major resolved
#514: Basic 2.2.1, Messages 2.1.2 - Embedded display limitations not clear (editorial)
bug minor resolved
#546: Basic 2.1 & 2.1.2 - Claims requested by profile scope not defined
bug critical resolved
#297: Basic 3.3.1 Check ID Request in query parameter a bad security practice
bug major resolved
#318: Basic, Messages - UserInfo Error Response format underspecified
bug minor resolved
#313: Basic, Messages - Specification silent on treatment of UserInfo Claims that are omitted, have null values, and have empty string values
bug minor resolved
#303: Basic, Messages, Standard - Use of state with implicit flow seems odd
bug minor resolved
#315: Basic, Messages - BCP47 / RFC 5646 references inconsistent (editorial)
bug minor resolved
#312: Basic, Messages - Id "backwards compatibility" statement out of place in an entirely new standard
bug major resolved
#311: Basic, Messages - Schema "backwards compatibility" statement not actionable
bug major resolved
#285: Basic - Specify that the id_token token type is JWT
bug major resolved
#133: Basic - 3.1. What is conversion? What benefit comes if it will be increased?
enhancement minor resolved
#272: Basic 4.1, Standard, Session - Authorization: Bearer examples should be JWTs (editorial)
bug minor resolved
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5