Assurance: The description of utility_bill/provider contradicts its definition in the JSON schema

“4.1.1.2. utility_bill” explains the provider sub-element as follows:

provider: REQUIRED. A JSON object identifying the respective provider that issued the bill. The object consists of the following properties:

name: A String designating the provider.

All elements of the OpenID Connect address Claim ([OpenID])

“5.1.1. Address Claim” in OIDC Core 1.0 says that the address claim contains the following fields.

formatted
street_address
locality
region
postal_code
country

As a result, provider should have name, formatted, street_address, locality, region, postal_code and country.

However, provider in the JSON schema is defined as follows:

‌

"provider":{
  "type":"object",
  "properties":{
    "name":{
      "type":"string"
    },
    "country":{
      "type":"string"
    },
    "region":{
      "type":"string"
    },
    "street_address":{
      "type":"string"
    }
  }
}

‌

formatted, locality and postal_code are missing.

Either the description in Section 4.1.1.2. or the JSON schema needs to be changed so that they don’t contradict each other.

Comments (2)