Addition of "Verification result" claim from TISA analysis

[Mark Haine]

As part of analysis by Nick Mothershaw of the TISA project in the UK a proposal for a new claim of "Verification result". This wouyld be used for communicating the state of the identitity verification process.

{  
   "verified_claims":{  
      "verification":{  
         "trust_framework":"tisa_aml",
         "time":"2012-04-23T18:25:43.511+01",
         "verification_process":"676q3636461467647q8498785747q487",
         "verification_result": "pending",  // Values of "verified", "pending", “part_verified”, ”not-verified", "fraud" //
         "evidence":[  ...

‌

Note - ”not-verified" and "fraud" values are arguably ‘not verified’ should these states would result in the returned data being returned outside of the "verified_claims"

[Mark Haine]

TISA UK

[Julian White]

Do we think this could be covered off by the changes we’ve made on the back of Issue #1224 and PR#54 by using the identity_assurance_level element in the response to say what the state is?

‌

[Julian White]

This has mostly been superseded by PR#87 except for the “pending” state issue.

[Mark Haine]

mostly resolved by PR #87 except pending which will be addressed elsewhere