OP metadata claims_in_verified_claims_supported and verified_claims_supported
Issue #1384
resolved
Do we need both claims_in_verified_claims_supported
and verified_claims_supported
? Are these being used?
or we can verified_claims_supported
as JSON array containing all Claims supported within `verified_claims`
and if there is at least one, then verified_claims is supported….
Comments (7)
-
-
Comment from Mike Jones that there shouldn’t be a significant problem for existing implementations if there requirement for the
verified_claims_supported
OP metadata item is dropped from the spec -
I don’t see a problem with dropping
verified_claims_supported
. -
reporter How about this: https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/181
-
-
addressed by PR#181
-
- changed status to resolved
resolved by PR#181
- Log in to comment
that has been present in the spec since it was first contributed in December 2019 see commit: https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/commits/6af01265a4a92d4c4a57f2779e7b7d8c5f2f04e5