1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. ekyc-ida

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (201–225 of 303)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#1229: restricte_id in claims
proposal major closed
#1200: Test OIDC4IDA with the VC use cases
task major new
#1226: Survey on eKYC-IDA implementations
enhancement major resolved
#1241: Is it mandatory to support verified claims in ID_Token?
bug major resolved
#1230: "End-User" vs. "user"
proposal minor closed
#1227: Alignment with PCTF and its Trusted Process concept
task minor resolved
#1097: Support Legal Entities
Authority claims/legal entity
proposal major resolved
#1215: Mention claim_types_supported and claims_supported application to verified_claims
proposal minor closed
#1235: verified_claim without trust_framework
Assurance
proposal minor resolved
#1234: Claim name length
bug major resolved
#1207: Recommend using Alpha-3 instead of Alpha-2 [ISO3166-1]
proposal major resolved
#1224: the trust_framework element contains both the TF and the IAL and they should be separate
Core eKYC&IDA
enhancement major resolved
#1209: Attachments with evidence documents
Core eKYC&IDA
proposal minor resolved
#1186: Expression Language
Conditional Claims
proposal major resolved
#1217: Add guidance of where the use of userinfo endpoint is optimal.
Core eKYC&IDA
proposal minor resolved
#1188: Embedded liability implications in the framework?
Assurance
enhancement major resolved
#1202: Verified claims extension: religious name / stage name (AKA)
Assurance
enhancement major resolved 1
#1221: Same Person different Subject Identifiers
Assurance
enhancement major wontfix
#1154: Mention complementary security standards (OAuth mTLS, etc)
Assurance
proposal minor resolved
#1166: Add note on FATF
enhancement major resolved
#1118: All claims should be in a scope
Assurance
bug major resolved 2
#1197: Evidence - qualified electronic signature
enhancement major resolved
#1220: Syntactically incorrect JSON in some examples
bug trivial closed
#1212: Should signed assertions be "MUST"?
proposal minor resolved
#1213: birth_*_name Description should use "name(s)" instead of just "name"
Authority claims/legal entity
proposal major closed
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. …
  5. 7
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12
  11. 13