Attendees

• Mark Haine
• Nat Sakimura
• Bjorn Hjelm
• Daniel Fett
• Dima Postnikov
• Don Thibeau
• Kosuke Koiwai
• Naohiro Fujie
• Nich Mothershaw
• Taylor Ongaro
• Victor Herraiz
• Anthony Nadalin
• Jan Kelin
• Stephane Mouy
• Tim Cappalli
• Wesley Dunnington
• Alberto Pulido

Agenda

• Brief review of external Orgs & Events
• PRs and Ticket
• Presentation - Expression language Update - Victor Herraiz

Brief review of external Orgs & Events

• European commission - Stephane
  • discussing how to integrate eKYC services into the eIDAS framework effectively
  • will prove update maybe on the next call
• SWIFT - Don
  • Don will continue to discuss with SWIFT forks and will share updates in 3 or 4 weeks
• ISO - Anthony
  • in activity on ISO, Anthony have been working to define levels of confidence and have been trying to map them with eKYC on the top of eIDAS, NIST SP800-63 trust frameworks
  • Anthony will share bit more detail on this in the next week
  • The approach is similar to “model_elements” which is raised as ticket #1191 and will continue to discuss on the ticket
  • Nat described of a new work item proposal on TC68 on eKYC on mobile. It’s up on the voting for now
  • It’s going to be one another blocking item that it will be might on ISO
  • Nat will share the details with the liaison committee
  • Nat will add Mark to the liaison committee

PRs and Ticket

• #1190, #1191, #1192, #1193 from TISA analysis
  • raised from the discussion around the presentation last week.
  • "verification result", "model_elements", "suggested changes", "evidenced_by"
  • Currently assigned to Mark but Nick will take over to manage on these issues
• #1189
  • skipped
• #1097 Supporting Legal Entities
  • eKYC for Legal Entities is complex issue, so it would be good to start from simple use cases.
  • Review Torsten’s document on this
• #1167
  • skipped
• #1188 Embedded liability implications
  • from some point of view, there is opinion that this is a technical specification and we should not cover the issue of liability
  • but at the same time, it would be very useful to consider how liability mitigation of dealt with because they are going to be extremely relevant
  • for example, in the financial institutions, they have different jurisdictional boundaries and they have different liability concerns, it is responsibilities of solution implementation of the spec definition
  • Don shared OIX papers 1, 2 on the topic of liability in identity systems which had considered on conformance to the standard and compliance to the regulation.
  • Assign this ticket to Don and Nick.

Presentation - Expression language Update - Victor Herraiz, Alberto Pulido

• Victor have presented about Santandar’s activities on Digital Trust.
• https://gruposantander.github.io/digital-trust-docs/
• The main motivation on this activity is for example, “Proof he/she is over 18 years old without sharing actual value” by verifying whether the answer of a question is true or false
• using expression language, RP can ask OP whether the value of claim is equal to the value which RP knows.
• matches values after normalize the value, such as capitalize.
• so far is not support language localization of claim values
• to support claim hash functions to privacy concern on OP, use hashed values to be matched
• supporting multiple expressions, combination of “greater than and less than”, and/or.
• Alberto showed demo implementation on job recruiting company