Wiki
Clone wikiekyc-ida / Minutes / eKYC-IDA_Meeting_Notes_2020-07-29
Attendees
- Mark Haine
- Nat Sakimura
- Bjorn Hjelm
- Torsten Ledderstedt
- Alberto Pulido
- Kosuke Koiwai
- Joseph Heenan
- Ralph Bragg
- Taylor Ongaro
- Manuela Sedvartaite
- Stephane Mouy
- Stephane Durand
- Kristina Yasuda
- Takahiko Kawasaki
- Anthony Nadalin
- Dima Postnikov
- Kai Lehmann
- Naohiro Fujie
Agenda
- Brief review of external Orgs & Events
- Agenda items
- PRs & Issues
Brief review of external Orgs & Events
- FDX - Nat Sakimura
- Start talking with FAPI2.0 adoption
- FDX have interested in eKYC
- Plan to have workshop with FAPI WG, members from eKYC&IDA WG are requested to be attended
- European Commission - Stephane Mouy
Agenda Items
-
Legal entity draft
- Attributes for legal entity
- Comparing to UK government's API of obtaining legal entities' attributes
- Relationship between legal entity and natural person
- Put authority element under the verified_claims of claims for natural person
- Applies_to, person, granted_by claims represent the relationship between the person and the legal entity
- Verification is done by claims provider under trust framework
- Put authority element under the verified_claims of claims for natural person
- Attributes for legal entity
-
Update on Expression Language debate Issue
#1186- Alberto, Kristina- Had discussion with W3C people
- Schema, JSONPath, etc
- W3C people said that VC will be appreciable to other scenarios
- Comment on bitbucket from Kristina
- We had some discussion at w3c verifiable credentials wg mailing list and there was a lot of interest in the topic. However, because there is no concrete draft/implementation on w3c side, I do not see a need for a joint wg with OIDF.
- Presentation exchange spec being worked on in DIF (decentralized identity foundation) can realize selective disclosure using “rule“, “count“, “from“ properties, but it is work in progress, and I would not recommend using it especially in finance industry just yet. https://identity.foundation/presentation-exchange/
- Overall, I think we can proceed with discussion in this group, as long as convergence with other initiatives in the space in the mid-long term is kept in mind..
- Comment on bitbucket from Kristina
-
Any other discussion points
- Request from A/B WG about constraining request to userInfo endpoint
- Separate endpoint definition from userInfo?
- TISA meeting
- 1pm in UK timezone
- Request from A/B WG about constraining request to userInfo endpoint
PRs & Issues
- no issues were discussed
Other topics
- The next call will be cancelled.
Updated