Wiki

Clone wiki

ekyc-ida / Minutes / eKYC-IDA_Meeting_Notes_2021-02-24

Attendees

  • Nat Sakimura
  • Bjorn Hjelm
  • Mark Haine
  • Daniel Fett
  • Torsten Lodderstedt
  • Takahiko Kawasaki
  • Joseph Heenan
  • Don Thibeau
  • Kosuke Koiwai
  • Ralph Bragg
  • Brian Campbell
  • Dima Postnikov
  • Kai Lehmann
  • Sascha Preibisch
  • Julian White
  • Naohiro Fujie

Agenda

  • Brief review of external Orgs & Event
  • Agenda items
  • PRs & Issues

Brief review of external Orgs & Event

  • UK Cross-Sector Digital Identity Forum - Mark
  • UK OB Extended Customer Attributes - Mark
    • Creating high level draft based on OIDC4IDA implementers draft 2  

Agenda Items

  • Kai has setup a pipe-line on the repository which is triggered by push.
  • Age verification – PR #42 - Daniel
    • Daniel proposed to prepare functions to address the problem of defining a boolean function over the age of a certain age or not.
    • There are two ways to implement the function
      • Function in claim name, such as 'birthdate|years_ago|gte(21)'
      • Function below claim name, such as "birthdate": { "op":[{"years_ago":nulll},{"gte":21}.
    • Kosuke commented that expression language will make this problem simpler
    • Nat commented that it is better to think about simpler way which is sufficient on common use-cases.
    • It better to involve people who have interest on age_verification/conditional claim, Mark consider to join the next connect core WG call.
    • Kai commented that Daniel's proposal might be useful other use-cases.
    • Mark and Daniel will have offline discussion on this.  

PRs & Issues

  • eKYC Roadmap & FAQ update Issue #1223 and Issue #1222
  • Alpha-3 vs Alpha-2 – PR #55 – relating to Issue #1207
    • Already got three approval
  • Missing OPTIONAL/REQUIRED qualifiers – PR #58
    • Already got two approval, will be merged
  • Match/unavailability metadata – PR #56
    • It would be better to make decision after PR #52 is completed
  • Attaching evidence documents PR #50
    • Merged
  • Abort/omit PR #52
    • Need to be reviewed by implementors
    • Sascha and Taka will review.
  • Issue #1228
    • Nat reported this to the board meeting.
    • Board considered there is no problem to use OIDF registry alternative to IANA registry, but they want to know what is the concern of the WG before make decision on the issue.
    • Nat and Mark will have offline meeting on this topic.

Updated