Attendees

• Mark Haine
• Torsten Lodderstedt
• Bjorn Hjelm
• Joseph Heenan
• Dima Postnikov
• Takahiko Kawasaki
• Kosuke Koiwai
• Daniel Fett
• Stuart Low
• Stephane Mouy
• Sascha Preibisch
• Julian White
• Naohiro Fujie

Agenda

• Agenda items
• PRs & Issues

Agenda Items

• Specification Split proposal – Torsten & Daniel
  • Torsten proposed to split PRs abort/omit, express language, age verification from implementers draft 3, because these PRs are more general topics from OIDC4IDA. These PRs should be separated to "request extension", etc.
  • The main purpose is to speed things up.
  • No objections from attendees.

PRs & Issues

• id_evidence _ PR #63 – Julian
  • Why the address claim is required
  • For the case to get address from evidence such as utility bill.
  • Mark suggested Jules to make separate PR this as schema extension.
• Address_iso_code – PR #67 – Torsten
  • Add country_code field to address claim
• Abort/omit PR #52 - Daniel
  • Proposed new json schema for request
• Match/unavailability metadata – PR #56 - Daniel
  • In case of handling a lot of IdPs, it would be good to know whether an IdP supports eKYC claims or not.
  • To know why the data is unavailable from the IdP
• Age verification – PR #42 – Torsten/Daniel
  • Suspend this PR because Daniel made another PR
• Requesting sub-claims – Issue #1238 – Torsten
  • Torsten removed the milestone. This is no longer related to the implementers draft 3.
• Owner of claims – Issue #1232 – Julian
  • Torsten suggested to leave "method" as Today, and add alternative claims, "validation" and "verification".
• Director claims – Issue #1236 – Naohiro/Mark
  • Naohiro will have discussion with METI to have director's claim on permission element
• Add LEI issuer claim – Issue #1237 – Naohiro/Mark
  • Mark's suggestion that to have structured claims for lei claim seems good.