Wiki
Clone wikiekyc-ida / Minutes / eKYC-IDA_Meeting_Notes_2021-03-24
Attendees
- Mark Haine
- Torsten Lodderstedt
- Bjorn Hjelm
- Joseph Heenan
- Dima Postnikov
- Takahiko Kawasaki
- Kosuke Koiwai
- Daniel Fett
- Stuart Low
- Stephane Mouy
- Sascha Preibisch
- Julian White
- Naohiro Fujie
Agenda
- Agenda items
- PRs & Issues
Agenda Items
- Specification Split proposal – Torsten & Daniel
- Torsten proposed to split PRs abort/omit, express language, age verification from implementers draft 3, because these PRs are more general topics from OIDC4IDA. These PRs should be separated to "request extension", etc.
- The main purpose is to speed things up.
- No objections from attendees.
PRs & Issues
- id_evidence _ PR #63 – Julian
- Why the address claim is required
- For the case to get address from evidence such as utility bill.
- Mark suggested Jules to make separate PR this as schema extension.
- Address_iso_code – PR #67 – Torsten
- Add country_code field to address claim
- Abort/omit PR #52 - Daniel
- Proposed new json schema for request
- Match/unavailability metadata – PR #56 - Daniel
- In case of handling a lot of IdPs, it would be good to know whether an IdP supports eKYC claims or not.
- To know why the data is unavailable from the IdP
- Age verification – PR #42 – Torsten/Daniel
- Suspend this PR because Daniel made another PR
- Requesting sub-claims – Issue
#1238– Torsten- Torsten removed the milestone. This is no longer related to the implementers draft 3.
- Owner of claims – Issue
#1232– Julian- Torsten suggested to leave "method" as Today, and add alternative claims, "validation" and "verification".
- Director claims – Issue #1236 – Naohiro/Mark
- Naohiro will have discussion with METI to have director's claim on permission element
- Add LEI issuer claim – Issue
#1237– Naohiro/Mark- Mark's suggestion that to have structured claims for lei claim seems good.
Updated